QSE Logo

LetsTalk2015@QSEng.com
612.308.4716

Recommissioning

In my November, 1998 Getting it Right column, I wrote about commissioning existing buildings; essentially what we now term Retro-Commissioning. That process is reserved for buildings that have never been commissioned before and, for whatever reason, are not performing to the owner’s satisfaction. This month we will discuss the Recommissioning process.

The term Recommissioning applies only to buildings that have previously been Commissioned or Retro-commissioned. The original commissioning process documented that the building systems performed as intended at one point in time. The intent of Recommissioning is to help ensure that the benefits of the initial commissioning process endure.

The Recommissioning process involves revisiting the systems at regular intervals and checking/retesting systems using the same checklists and test procedures used during the original Commissioning or Retro-Commissioning project. This periodic retesting should become part of the normal preventive maintenance plan initiated through whatever work-order system an owner has in place. In this way Recommissioning is seen not as something special or something which can be done “if there is time” but as a fundamental business-as-usual process.

How often should Recommissioning tests be performed? That will vary from system-to-system, building-to-building, and owner-to-owner and depends on a number of factors, including:

  • How critical is proper system performance to the owner?

  • How will the improper performance of a system impact the performance of other systems?

  • How frequently are parts of the building renovated?

  • How frequently do space occupants and/or usage change?

  • What is the energy cost impact of improperly performing systems?

Typically, owners should consider annual, semi-annual or seasonal retesting of major central systems such as chilled water generation and distribution; boilers, heat exchangers, and associated distribution systems; and large air handling units. Terminal units and other systems serving smaller zones may be tested every 1-3 years, depending on the dynamic nature of the building.

The key to incorporating recommissioning activities into “business as usual” is to compile a list of tests to be conducted and their respective frequency and then spreading the tests across the entire year. In this way, many of the repetitive system tests (i.e., variable air volume units, finned tube radiation, etc.) will be performed 2-3 per week and not be considered an onerous undertaking.

These test procedures can result in a secondary benefit by providing a hands-on training process for new operations staff. Perhaps the first assignment new maintenance engineers are given will be to participate in a variety of retests in order to learn and understand the intended system operation.

Now that all of the operations folks out there are thinking I’m totally in outer space, I need to say that Recommissioning activities are not something that can be “slipped into” a preventive maintenance program without anyone noticing. Retesting involves a finite period of time to perform and document the procedures, and most operations organizations don’t have excess time to fill. Therefore, Recommissioning needs to be an organizational priority and appropriate staff and funds allocated to the effort.

The benefits of Recommissioning (i.e., the answer to Management’s question, “Why should we pay for this?”) include:

  • Continued energy savings associated with properly operating systems.

  • Continued safe operation of critical spaces such as laboratories.

  • Continued environmental control criteria adherence for critical spaces such as clean rooms, museums, archives, etc.

  • Documented proper ventilation system operation to help avoid indoor air quality complaints and litigation.

  • Extended life expectancy of equipment through the periodic verification of proper operating parameters.

Recommissioning is critical for verifying that the systems continue to function at their peak efficiency and effectiveness throughout their lives. In addition, it recognizes the importance of documenting inevitable building changes and their effect on the systems serving the building. Recommissioning will prevent the building from spiraling out of control and triggering the need to start over again with a new Retro-Commissioning process.

 

COMMISSIONING: GETTING IT RIGHT

Engineered Systems, February, 2001

Rebecca Ellis, PE, LEED AP, CCP, CxA
President
Questions & Solutions Engineering
1079 Falls Curve
Chaska, MN  55318
rteesmag@QSEng.com